Skip to main content

Married to Money

Nearly everyone imagines getting married one day. Some girls create a Pinterest board with the perfect dress, venue, and bouquet, while others don't. Regardless of the amount of thought put into it, the majority of people picture having a grand white wedding with all their friends and family--just a happy time. But aside from the obvious fear of commitment and attention, one of the scariest parts of a wedding is paying for it.

Sources state that the average wedding costs $38,700. This includes the cost of an engagement ring ($5,000), the ceremony and reception ($29,200), and a honeymoon ($4,500). To put this into perspective, according to the U.S. Census, the average household income in 2018 was $63,179. That means on average, couples spend over 60% of their annual income on a single unrecurring event--and that's being generous considering the fact that new couples make less early on.

As Didion criticizes the commercialized nature of American culture, she exemplifies with a classy tradition turned trashy. Yet, we can also condemn the other end of the spectrum: extravagance. Though a bride sharing her veil with five other women shows nonchalance for a special commitment, spending hundreds of dollars for the perfect one demonstrates unnecessary obsession for an over-glorified ideal.

But of course, I'll probably be just as guilty as anyone to spend an overwhelming amount of money on this institution. I tell myself, "I can save money" or "I don't need this," but in fifteen years I'll probably succumb to the pressures of upgrades and glamour too.

Comments

  1. I really like how you looked into the costs of weddings as another way to explain capitalism for special ceremonies like those.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love how you researched into the exact cause of weddings in America, especially spending tens of thousands of dollars on one day. I like how flipped the narrative of what we talked about in class to question extravagence and how that plays a role into the capitalism. Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you included the costs of weddings and how people spend nearly their whole income on one single day. Even if we criticize this notion, we most likely will go down that road inevitably someday, so it's kind of impossible to escape the capitalism.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I loved your statement of Didion showing a "classy tradition turned trashy" because of capitalism. Shocking how much a wedding costs these days!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like how you said that even though big weddings are so romanticized and unnecssary, many still do it. Truthfully, I'll probably succumb in the future the same as you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is such an interesting look into weddings! Though we often criticize or look down on the amount of money spent on a wedding, sometimes it's nice to splurge on a once in a lifetime opportunity.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Gray Area

As we discuss the roles of pictures and words in conveying a story, I become mildly conflicted in several aspects. First, and most obviously, which one does the better job? To me, both forms of storytelling allow for creativity and personal thought. But, while writing is both specific and yet very imagination-based, illustrations tend to be only the latter. A drawing calls for "broader topics" (McCloud 815) of assumptions. And while that may be seen as a good thing, I see it as a source of miscommunication. Because images are open to so many different interpretations, often, the author's intended meaning is not truly understood. Similarly, I regularly find myself wondering if, as readers, we also look too much into the text and find meaning when the author actually had none. What if the author didn't really have a specific theme in mind and just wanted to write an amusing story? Of course, I may just be too simple-minded and unqualified, but I find myself doubting t...

Never Let Anyone Dull your Sparkle! (unless you're the 1920s)

Knowing that the Great Gatsby is set in the 1920s, I had been looking forward to reading the book for so long. This decade has always fascinated me because of its creation of a new society, which--for the first time in history--is relatable to ours. In my perspective, before the 1920s, history was bleak, the human lifestyle seemed near archaic, and nothing was the slightest bit comparable to the twenty-first century. But at the turn of a new decade, Roaring Twenties brought along the "New Woman" and the birth of mass culture, including a surge of trends and technology. A curtain for my car window? Of course, I'll buy it! However, in the Great Gatsby , I seemed to have forgotten that the book I was reading was about my favorite decade! Where's the excitement and innovation? Why aren't advertisements for the Model-T being shoved in my face? Needless to say, I was underwhelmed! But I don't think I was alone in thinking this. In fact, Fitzgerald's mess...

New Rules...

Rules. They're a set of regulations that we abide by daily. They're meant to create organization, civil conduct, and improvement among society. And it's necessary to enforce these rules so that order and integrity are ensured. But somewhere along the way of enforcing and following these rules, the purpose behind making them has been forgotten. At school, tardies exist to ensure that students are present for the lesson. But when you step into the classroom 30 seconds late (because of the terrible traffic leading up to the school campus), a mere four days of the ten weeks of a quarter, you are expected to spend several hours sitting idly for detention. The advisors tell you, "this will teach you to be punctual." But does it really make sense to be punished for multiple hours for missing a grand total of two minutes of your first period where class hasn't even really begun? Or when your teacher plays a movie because the school year is practically over, and yo...