Skip to main content

Never Let Anyone Dull your Sparkle! (unless you're the 1920s)

Knowing that the Great Gatsby is set in the 1920s, I had been looking forward to reading the book for so long. This decade has always fascinated me because of its creation of a new society, which--for the first time in history--is relatable to ours.

In my perspective, before the 1920s, history was bleak, the human lifestyle seemed near archaic, and nothing was the slightest bit comparable to the twenty-first century. But at the turn of a new decade, Roaring Twenties brought along the "New Woman" and the birth of mass culture, including a surge of trends and technology.

A curtain for my car window? Of course, I'll buy it!

However, in the Great Gatsby, I seemed to have forgotten that the book I was reading was about my favorite decade! Where's the excitement and innovation? Why aren't advertisements for the Model-T being shoved in my face? Needless to say, I was underwhelmed!

But I don't think I was alone in thinking this. In fact, Fitzgerald's message is that this new and exciting prosperity of a new era was over-glorified. He exposed the true nature of society as he described Doctor Eckleburg's eyes: "dimmed a little by many paintless days under the sun and rain, brood on over the solemn dumping ground." As a symbol of wealth, these eyes lose their brightness as do the spirits of the wealthy when their internal unhappiness shines through.

We no longer see money and novelties as the equivalent of happiness and excitement; instead, we dread the misery and drama that Fitzgerald's characters experience behind closed doors. And through this, he teaches us that a wealthy, materialistic society shouldn't be glamorized, but understood, really, as lonely and miserable.

Comments

  1. Nice, I've never really thought about when American society started to become comparable to today, but now that you point it out the 1920s does make sense. I feel like the advertisements, the consumerism and such were all implicitly in the book's background - they go hand in hand with the wealthy's lives. Maybe history has given us a false impression - the poor's suffering and certainly the wealthy's dysfunctional relationships are not recorded in the textbooks, only the end product being the Great Depression. It takes writers like Fitzgerald to bring to light and critique the societal problems from that era.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Man it really was underwhelming, for me personally I felt the underwhelmingness specifically because we started reading this right after Song of Solomon which was so full of detail and technique. I felt like the descriptions of parties and New York could have been drawn out and had more prominence, at least with my expectations of the book knowing what Fitzgerald was writing about. I still liked it though.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree that it really was underwhelming. In US History, it seemed to me like such a magical time, and no one had any problems. I think the reason Fitzgerald displayed the novel like that is to prove how messed up and unrealistic that kind of life is.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with the fact that I was admittedly a little underwhelmed when I began reading the novel. I too always was in awe of what I heard of this era but I think you did a very nice job in clarifying how the authors purpose of writing this book was not to continue to glamorize the 1920's, but to give readers an up close understanding of what reality for many people behind closed-doors was.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I too was underwhelmed when I started reading the book. Whenever I heard the title of the book, I pictured something lavish and luxurious. I associated these qualities with positive things. However, Fitzgerald conveys an opposite message: luxury and wealth don't equate happiness or a high quality of life.

    ReplyDelete
  6. sabrina this was so well written! I feel the same way about great gatsby - i was waiting for those sparkly descriptions of parties and dresses but it never really came. I thought that great gatsby would be more crazy asians esque (the books are literally descriptions of brand names without a plot). However, even though it wasn't what I expected, I still thought Fitzgerald did good to expose us beyond decade stereotypes and into the reality of both the elite and the middle class. (Sidenote: hopefully the movie of great gatsby will be more sparkly)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Again, this was very well written. I totally agree about the over-glorification... Nice comparison with a quote! I never thought about how the novel didn't feel like it was in the twenties, but now that you mention it, I can't go without noticing it!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fiction of Eye Contact

This picture makes me so  uncomfortable.  While it's eye-opening to find reason behind the normalities of point of view in film, the eye-level shot appears far from normal in my eyes. Is it the purple suit? The hands crossed? Or the specific positioning of the viewer on a table that makes me so uneasy? It's probably a combination of my suspicions, but I've decided that to its core, it's the eye contact that creates my discomfort. Most of these types of shots never reach the extent of eye contact. Instead, the similarity in levels creates a feeling of similarity shared by the character and viewer. There is no power disparity, no difference in viewpoint. Look at Forrest Gump and this eye-level shot (note that he's not looking at you). But once eye contact comes into play, the connection is too strong. Of course, any good producer will aim to form a connection for an audience to a film. However, there's comfort in a screen lying between a film and its viewer. It...

The War

Despite the countless pieces of legislation passed under Roosevelt, what got America out of the depression was World War II. After World War I, America was actually very Isolationist. So as Roosevelt approached the war, he gradually promoted an Interventionist mindset. I mean, if Germany's going to intervene with everyone, why can't the U.S.?  So Roosevelt started getting involved with revising neutrality acts to allow for a cash-and-carry policy and later the Lend-Lease act so that the U.S. could provide arms and aid to the French and UK. And then, Pearl Harbor happened, so we all know what came next. Actual war. He was pretty much priming the U.S. for war so that when war actually happened, everyone wouldn't be in shock. Although FDR didn't live to see the end of the war he brought his country into, according to my AP Gov breakout rooms, he was deemed the most worthy of all the remaining Presidents to be carved into Mt. Rushmore. Both for the democratic party and demo...

F*** It

After years of calculative thinking and cautiousness, in 2020, I started living a little more in accordance to the f*** it mantra. Quite obviously, senior year is the year of worry, and the pandemic has not been of help; but recently I've taken the mindset of not caring so much and not doting on what I can't control. (It could also be because of my avoidant personality type, but for now, I'll take it as a good thing.) It's easy to be positive when things go your way, and I've had the privilege of being able to be positive for my whole life. Amidst aspects of my life that suddenly went wrong this year, I have deviated slightly from my typical upbeat self at times; but more and more, I see how beneficial it is to think f*** it  (with consciousness, of course). As much as everyone suggests looking on the bright side of things, when you don't want to, it really sucks. And while I can't say I actively tried to look on the bright side everyone spoke of, I did seek...