Skip to main content

Married to Money

Nearly everyone imagines getting married one day. Some girls create a Pinterest board with the perfect dress, venue, and bouquet, while others don't. Regardless of the amount of thought put into it, the majority of people picture having a grand white wedding with all their friends and family--just a happy time. But aside from the obvious fear of commitment and attention, one of the scariest parts of a wedding is paying for it.

Sources state that the average wedding costs $38,700. This includes the cost of an engagement ring ($5,000), the ceremony and reception ($29,200), and a honeymoon ($4,500). To put this into perspective, according to the U.S. Census, the average household income in 2018 was $63,179. That means on average, couples spend over 60% of their annual income on a single unrecurring event--and that's being generous considering the fact that new couples make less early on.

As Didion criticizes the commercialized nature of American culture, she exemplifies with a classy tradition turned trashy. Yet, we can also condemn the other end of the spectrum: extravagance. Though a bride sharing her veil with five other women shows nonchalance for a special commitment, spending hundreds of dollars for the perfect one demonstrates unnecessary obsession for an over-glorified ideal.

But of course, I'll probably be just as guilty as anyone to spend an overwhelming amount of money on this institution. I tell myself, "I can save money" or "I don't need this," but in fifteen years I'll probably succumb to the pressures of upgrades and glamour too.

Comments

  1. I really like how you looked into the costs of weddings as another way to explain capitalism for special ceremonies like those.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love how you researched into the exact cause of weddings in America, especially spending tens of thousands of dollars on one day. I like how flipped the narrative of what we talked about in class to question extravagence and how that plays a role into the capitalism. Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you included the costs of weddings and how people spend nearly their whole income on one single day. Even if we criticize this notion, we most likely will go down that road inevitably someday, so it's kind of impossible to escape the capitalism.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I loved your statement of Didion showing a "classy tradition turned trashy" because of capitalism. Shocking how much a wedding costs these days!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like how you said that even though big weddings are so romanticized and unnecssary, many still do it. Truthfully, I'll probably succumb in the future the same as you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is such an interesting look into weddings! Though we often criticize or look down on the amount of money spent on a wedding, sometimes it's nice to splurge on a once in a lifetime opportunity.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fiction of Eye Contact

This picture makes me so  uncomfortable.  While it's eye-opening to find reason behind the normalities of point of view in film, the eye-level shot appears far from normal in my eyes. Is it the purple suit? The hands crossed? Or the specific positioning of the viewer on a table that makes me so uneasy? It's probably a combination of my suspicions, but I've decided that to its core, it's the eye contact that creates my discomfort. Most of these types of shots never reach the extent of eye contact. Instead, the similarity in levels creates a feeling of similarity shared by the character and viewer. There is no power disparity, no difference in viewpoint. Look at Forrest Gump and this eye-level shot (note that he's not looking at you). But once eye contact comes into play, the connection is too strong. Of course, any good producer will aim to form a connection for an audience to a film. However, there's comfort in a screen lying between a film and its viewer. It...

The War

Despite the countless pieces of legislation passed under Roosevelt, what got America out of the depression was World War II. After World War I, America was actually very Isolationist. So as Roosevelt approached the war, he gradually promoted an Interventionist mindset. I mean, if Germany's going to intervene with everyone, why can't the U.S.?  So Roosevelt started getting involved with revising neutrality acts to allow for a cash-and-carry policy and later the Lend-Lease act so that the U.S. could provide arms and aid to the French and UK. And then, Pearl Harbor happened, so we all know what came next. Actual war. He was pretty much priming the U.S. for war so that when war actually happened, everyone wouldn't be in shock. Although FDR didn't live to see the end of the war he brought his country into, according to my AP Gov breakout rooms, he was deemed the most worthy of all the remaining Presidents to be carved into Mt. Rushmore. Both for the democratic party and demo...

F*** It

After years of calculative thinking and cautiousness, in 2020, I started living a little more in accordance to the f*** it mantra. Quite obviously, senior year is the year of worry, and the pandemic has not been of help; but recently I've taken the mindset of not caring so much and not doting on what I can't control. (It could also be because of my avoidant personality type, but for now, I'll take it as a good thing.) It's easy to be positive when things go your way, and I've had the privilege of being able to be positive for my whole life. Amidst aspects of my life that suddenly went wrong this year, I have deviated slightly from my typical upbeat self at times; but more and more, I see how beneficial it is to think f*** it  (with consciousness, of course). As much as everyone suggests looking on the bright side of things, when you don't want to, it really sucks. And while I can't say I actively tried to look on the bright side everyone spoke of, I did seek...