Skip to main content

Married to Money

Nearly everyone imagines getting married one day. Some girls create a Pinterest board with the perfect dress, venue, and bouquet, while others don't. Regardless of the amount of thought put into it, the majority of people picture having a grand white wedding with all their friends and family--just a happy time. But aside from the obvious fear of commitment and attention, one of the scariest parts of a wedding is paying for it.

Sources state that the average wedding costs $38,700. This includes the cost of an engagement ring ($5,000), the ceremony and reception ($29,200), and a honeymoon ($4,500). To put this into perspective, according to the U.S. Census, the average household income in 2018 was $63,179. That means on average, couples spend over 60% of their annual income on a single unrecurring event--and that's being generous considering the fact that new couples make less early on.

As Didion criticizes the commercialized nature of American culture, she exemplifies with a classy tradition turned trashy. Yet, we can also condemn the other end of the spectrum: extravagance. Though a bride sharing her veil with five other women shows nonchalance for a special commitment, spending hundreds of dollars for the perfect one demonstrates unnecessary obsession for an over-glorified ideal.

But of course, I'll probably be just as guilty as anyone to spend an overwhelming amount of money on this institution. I tell myself, "I can save money" or "I don't need this," but in fifteen years I'll probably succumb to the pressures of upgrades and glamour too.

Comments

  1. I really like how you looked into the costs of weddings as another way to explain capitalism for special ceremonies like those.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I love how you researched into the exact cause of weddings in America, especially spending tens of thousands of dollars on one day. I like how flipped the narrative of what we talked about in class to question extravagence and how that plays a role into the capitalism. Good Job!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like how you included the costs of weddings and how people spend nearly their whole income on one single day. Even if we criticize this notion, we most likely will go down that road inevitably someday, so it's kind of impossible to escape the capitalism.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I loved your statement of Didion showing a "classy tradition turned trashy" because of capitalism. Shocking how much a wedding costs these days!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I really like how you said that even though big weddings are so romanticized and unnecssary, many still do it. Truthfully, I'll probably succumb in the future the same as you.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is such an interesting look into weddings! Though we often criticize or look down on the amount of money spent on a wedding, sometimes it's nice to splurge on a once in a lifetime opportunity.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pick Your Poison

 Would you rather find out that your significant other is cheating on you or never find out? Though very far away and presumably irrelevant to your and my current circumstances, this question raises an issue that's not so far from what we know: Is ignorance really bliss? Sure, I typically respond to the opening question by selecting the latter choice of oblivion as I imagine the pain and hassle it entails, but after I contemplate and fight my instinct, I choose the wiser option. The more daunting one. I choose to pop the bubble of ignorance and learn the truth. Let's break it down. Your significant other is cheating on you. This action may be a result of a few reasons, the major being dissatisfaction in the relationship and/or sole disloyalty and a lack of integrity. A cheater is prone to cheating more than once, and if one continues it may just be a sign of bad character. Do you really want to be with someone who isn't committed to you? Someone who doesn't find satisfa...

Welcome Back

Every meeting, email, or letter begins with a greeting. "Good morning," "hello," or "dear *recipient.*" Only once an opening has been made can the intent of communication be addressed. However, though unnecessary in content, such polite phrases serve to transition and maintain friendly relations beyond just solemn work. In Korean, the staple greeting comparable to "hi" or "hello," literally means, how are you? However, no one interprets it that way or responds to the question. Despite not staying true to its meaning, it is a necessary means of easing into the meat of a conversation. Very isolated from the other employees, I often found myself asking for favors or questions at work without saying "hi" or "how are you" first. I noticed I was disrupting their work and disregarding their existence as a person and instead only seeing them as a source of inquiry. By bypassing any greeting, any conversation becomes too a...

The Fiction of Eye Contact

This picture makes me so  uncomfortable.  While it's eye-opening to find reason behind the normalities of point of view in film, the eye-level shot appears far from normal in my eyes. Is it the purple suit? The hands crossed? Or the specific positioning of the viewer on a table that makes me so uneasy? It's probably a combination of my suspicions, but I've decided that to its core, it's the eye contact that creates my discomfort. Most of these types of shots never reach the extent of eye contact. Instead, the similarity in levels creates a feeling of similarity shared by the character and viewer. There is no power disparity, no difference in viewpoint. Look at Forrest Gump and this eye-level shot (note that he's not looking at you). But once eye contact comes into play, the connection is too strong. Of course, any good producer will aim to form a connection for an audience to a film. However, there's comfort in a screen lying between a film and its viewer. It...