Skip to main content

Fact or Fiction?

Stereotypes. They are generalized assumptions about a group of people like "Asians are smart," or "Americans are fat and dumb"-- statements we all know too well. And the thing with stereotypes is that they hold true to a certain extent. That's why they can be so offensive! But have you ever wondered how or why these stereotypes came to be?

Jews, in particular, are often seen as frugal and even greedy, and in Maus, Spiegelman makes no attempt to hide that. Repeatedly, Spiegelman interrupts the chronology of Vladek's Holocaust account to allow Vladek to complain about his family's use of money. On page 116 of Maus I, Vladek picks up a telephone wire laying among some trash, and in response, Art becomes irritated and asks, "can't you just buy wire?" This kind of reaction is understandable, as Vladek seems to reinforce such a negative stereotype. 



What Art and most people don't realize, though, is that Vladek's experience has shaped him to act in such a manner. During the Holocaust, Vladek and his family soon realized that their wealth could not guarantee their safety and comfort. His attempt to pay his way out of Poland only led to his imprisonment, and his provision of food to the man outside the bunker led to his discovery. And later in the camps, money lost its value; having money did not necessarily allow for buying food or products. This sort of realization became reflected in Vladek's current lifestyle as he explained that "this wire they don't have it in any stores." 

By emphasizing Vladek's concern to hoard his money, Spiegelman conveys a point that the behaviors people display are wired and truly understandable as an effect of trauma and impactful experience. So although we, Americans, may be seen as gluttonous and ignorant, I guess you could say... look on the bright side?

Comments

  1. I really liked how you started your piece with examples of stereotypes that everyone can understand and relate to in some way. I also thought you did a very nice job describing how the events Vladek took place in shaped him to act the way he does and how that ties to people not being able to understand another's traits or actions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked how you centered you blog around stereotypes and how it effects Vladek and his actions. I also liked how you related everything back to Americans at the end of your blog. I also liked how you describe how Art acts in this event because it is critical to understanding the relationship between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked how you started your post about stereotypes that are so prevalent today, and continued to relate everything back to it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The beginning with a broad claim, which was then narrowed down to it's application in Maus, was great format, and I also liked the way you had American as an example in the beginning and then brought it up again in the end, kept the consistency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Gray Area

As we discuss the roles of pictures and words in conveying a story, I become mildly conflicted in several aspects. First, and most obviously, which one does the better job? To me, both forms of storytelling allow for creativity and personal thought. But, while writing is both specific and yet very imagination-based, illustrations tend to be only the latter. A drawing calls for "broader topics" (McCloud 815) of assumptions. And while that may be seen as a good thing, I see it as a source of miscommunication. Because images are open to so many different interpretations, often, the author's intended meaning is not truly understood. Similarly, I regularly find myself wondering if, as readers, we also look too much into the text and find meaning when the author actually had none. What if the author didn't really have a specific theme in mind and just wanted to write an amusing story? Of course, I may just be too simple-minded and unqualified, but I find myself doubting t...

Never Let Anyone Dull your Sparkle! (unless you're the 1920s)

Knowing that the Great Gatsby is set in the 1920s, I had been looking forward to reading the book for so long. This decade has always fascinated me because of its creation of a new society, which--for the first time in history--is relatable to ours. In my perspective, before the 1920s, history was bleak, the human lifestyle seemed near archaic, and nothing was the slightest bit comparable to the twenty-first century. But at the turn of a new decade, Roaring Twenties brought along the "New Woman" and the birth of mass culture, including a surge of trends and technology. A curtain for my car window? Of course, I'll buy it! However, in the Great Gatsby , I seemed to have forgotten that the book I was reading was about my favorite decade! Where's the excitement and innovation? Why aren't advertisements for the Model-T being shoved in my face? Needless to say, I was underwhelmed! But I don't think I was alone in thinking this. In fact, Fitzgerald's mess...

War and Peace

Violence. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it as the use of physical force so as to injure, abuse, damage, or destroy. In most ways violence can seem very obvious because of its portrayal in movies, video games, and crime; you picture blood, weapons, and fighting. But there seem to be sources of violence that tend to be less physical.  While looking at an image of a young boy in the arms of, presumably, his father whose head was covered by a bag, it seems that most of us agreed that it isn't  a violent image. In disbelief, Mrs. Valentino exclaimed that it is actually violent. However, in my head, it came across as almost peaceful. Now, I do acknowledge the sadness of this image, but what I really saw was a boy reuniting with his father among the vastness of a desert. There was a stillness that was reflected by the picture instead of the usual chaos that physical violence entails. So what really is violence? We can almost all agree that there should be a line dra...