Skip to main content

Fact or Fiction?

Stereotypes. They are generalized assumptions about a group of people like "Asians are smart," or "Americans are fat and dumb"-- statements we all know too well. And the thing with stereotypes is that they hold true to a certain extent. That's why they can be so offensive! But have you ever wondered how or why these stereotypes came to be?

Jews, in particular, are often seen as frugal and even greedy, and in Maus, Spiegelman makes no attempt to hide that. Repeatedly, Spiegelman interrupts the chronology of Vladek's Holocaust account to allow Vladek to complain about his family's use of money. On page 116 of Maus I, Vladek picks up a telephone wire laying among some trash, and in response, Art becomes irritated and asks, "can't you just buy wire?" This kind of reaction is understandable, as Vladek seems to reinforce such a negative stereotype. 



What Art and most people don't realize, though, is that Vladek's experience has shaped him to act in such a manner. During the Holocaust, Vladek and his family soon realized that their wealth could not guarantee their safety and comfort. His attempt to pay his way out of Poland only led to his imprisonment, and his provision of food to the man outside the bunker led to his discovery. And later in the camps, money lost its value; having money did not necessarily allow for buying food or products. This sort of realization became reflected in Vladek's current lifestyle as he explained that "this wire they don't have it in any stores." 

By emphasizing Vladek's concern to hoard his money, Spiegelman conveys a point that the behaviors people display are wired and truly understandable as an effect of trauma and impactful experience. So although we, Americans, may be seen as gluttonous and ignorant, I guess you could say... look on the bright side?

Comments

  1. I really liked how you started your piece with examples of stereotypes that everyone can understand and relate to in some way. I also thought you did a very nice job describing how the events Vladek took place in shaped him to act the way he does and how that ties to people not being able to understand another's traits or actions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked how you centered you blog around stereotypes and how it effects Vladek and his actions. I also liked how you related everything back to Americans at the end of your blog. I also liked how you describe how Art acts in this event because it is critical to understanding the relationship between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked how you started your post about stereotypes that are so prevalent today, and continued to relate everything back to it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The beginning with a broad claim, which was then narrowed down to it's application in Maus, was great format, and I also liked the way you had American as an example in the beginning and then brought it up again in the end, kept the consistency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pick Your Poison

 Would you rather find out that your significant other is cheating on you or never find out? Though very far away and presumably irrelevant to your and my current circumstances, this question raises an issue that's not so far from what we know: Is ignorance really bliss? Sure, I typically respond to the opening question by selecting the latter choice of oblivion as I imagine the pain and hassle it entails, but after I contemplate and fight my instinct, I choose the wiser option. The more daunting one. I choose to pop the bubble of ignorance and learn the truth. Let's break it down. Your significant other is cheating on you. This action may be a result of a few reasons, the major being dissatisfaction in the relationship and/or sole disloyalty and a lack of integrity. A cheater is prone to cheating more than once, and if one continues it may just be a sign of bad character. Do you really want to be with someone who isn't committed to you? Someone who doesn't find satisfa...

Welcome Back

Every meeting, email, or letter begins with a greeting. "Good morning," "hello," or "dear *recipient.*" Only once an opening has been made can the intent of communication be addressed. However, though unnecessary in content, such polite phrases serve to transition and maintain friendly relations beyond just solemn work. In Korean, the staple greeting comparable to "hi" or "hello," literally means, how are you? However, no one interprets it that way or responds to the question. Despite not staying true to its meaning, it is a necessary means of easing into the meat of a conversation. Very isolated from the other employees, I often found myself asking for favors or questions at work without saying "hi" or "how are you" first. I noticed I was disrupting their work and disregarding their existence as a person and instead only seeing them as a source of inquiry. By bypassing any greeting, any conversation becomes too a...

The Fiction of Eye Contact

This picture makes me so  uncomfortable.  While it's eye-opening to find reason behind the normalities of point of view in film, the eye-level shot appears far from normal in my eyes. Is it the purple suit? The hands crossed? Or the specific positioning of the viewer on a table that makes me so uneasy? It's probably a combination of my suspicions, but I've decided that to its core, it's the eye contact that creates my discomfort. Most of these types of shots never reach the extent of eye contact. Instead, the similarity in levels creates a feeling of similarity shared by the character and viewer. There is no power disparity, no difference in viewpoint. Look at Forrest Gump and this eye-level shot (note that he's not looking at you). But once eye contact comes into play, the connection is too strong. Of course, any good producer will aim to form a connection for an audience to a film. However, there's comfort in a screen lying between a film and its viewer. It...