Skip to main content

Fact or Fiction?

Stereotypes. They are generalized assumptions about a group of people like "Asians are smart," or "Americans are fat and dumb"-- statements we all know too well. And the thing with stereotypes is that they hold true to a certain extent. That's why they can be so offensive! But have you ever wondered how or why these stereotypes came to be?

Jews, in particular, are often seen as frugal and even greedy, and in Maus, Spiegelman makes no attempt to hide that. Repeatedly, Spiegelman interrupts the chronology of Vladek's Holocaust account to allow Vladek to complain about his family's use of money. On page 116 of Maus I, Vladek picks up a telephone wire laying among some trash, and in response, Art becomes irritated and asks, "can't you just buy wire?" This kind of reaction is understandable, as Vladek seems to reinforce such a negative stereotype. 



What Art and most people don't realize, though, is that Vladek's experience has shaped him to act in such a manner. During the Holocaust, Vladek and his family soon realized that their wealth could not guarantee their safety and comfort. His attempt to pay his way out of Poland only led to his imprisonment, and his provision of food to the man outside the bunker led to his discovery. And later in the camps, money lost its value; having money did not necessarily allow for buying food or products. This sort of realization became reflected in Vladek's current lifestyle as he explained that "this wire they don't have it in any stores." 

By emphasizing Vladek's concern to hoard his money, Spiegelman conveys a point that the behaviors people display are wired and truly understandable as an effect of trauma and impactful experience. So although we, Americans, may be seen as gluttonous and ignorant, I guess you could say... look on the bright side?

Comments

  1. I really liked how you started your piece with examples of stereotypes that everyone can understand and relate to in some way. I also thought you did a very nice job describing how the events Vladek took place in shaped him to act the way he does and how that ties to people not being able to understand another's traits or actions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked how you centered you blog around stereotypes and how it effects Vladek and his actions. I also liked how you related everything back to Americans at the end of your blog. I also liked how you describe how Art acts in this event because it is critical to understanding the relationship between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked how you started your post about stereotypes that are so prevalent today, and continued to relate everything back to it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The beginning with a broad claim, which was then narrowed down to it's application in Maus, was great format, and I also liked the way you had American as an example in the beginning and then brought it up again in the end, kept the consistency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Fiction of Eye Contact

This picture makes me so  uncomfortable.  While it's eye-opening to find reason behind the normalities of point of view in film, the eye-level shot appears far from normal in my eyes. Is it the purple suit? The hands crossed? Or the specific positioning of the viewer on a table that makes me so uneasy? It's probably a combination of my suspicions, but I've decided that to its core, it's the eye contact that creates my discomfort. Most of these types of shots never reach the extent of eye contact. Instead, the similarity in levels creates a feeling of similarity shared by the character and viewer. There is no power disparity, no difference in viewpoint. Look at Forrest Gump and this eye-level shot (note that he's not looking at you). But once eye contact comes into play, the connection is too strong. Of course, any good producer will aim to form a connection for an audience to a film. However, there's comfort in a screen lying between a film and its viewer. It...

The War

Despite the countless pieces of legislation passed under Roosevelt, what got America out of the depression was World War II. After World War I, America was actually very Isolationist. So as Roosevelt approached the war, he gradually promoted an Interventionist mindset. I mean, if Germany's going to intervene with everyone, why can't the U.S.?  So Roosevelt started getting involved with revising neutrality acts to allow for a cash-and-carry policy and later the Lend-Lease act so that the U.S. could provide arms and aid to the French and UK. And then, Pearl Harbor happened, so we all know what came next. Actual war. He was pretty much priming the U.S. for war so that when war actually happened, everyone wouldn't be in shock. Although FDR didn't live to see the end of the war he brought his country into, according to my AP Gov breakout rooms, he was deemed the most worthy of all the remaining Presidents to be carved into Mt. Rushmore. Both for the democratic party and demo...

F*** It

After years of calculative thinking and cautiousness, in 2020, I started living a little more in accordance to the f*** it mantra. Quite obviously, senior year is the year of worry, and the pandemic has not been of help; but recently I've taken the mindset of not caring so much and not doting on what I can't control. (It could also be because of my avoidant personality type, but for now, I'll take it as a good thing.) It's easy to be positive when things go your way, and I've had the privilege of being able to be positive for my whole life. Amidst aspects of my life that suddenly went wrong this year, I have deviated slightly from my typical upbeat self at times; but more and more, I see how beneficial it is to think f*** it  (with consciousness, of course). As much as everyone suggests looking on the bright side of things, when you don't want to, it really sucks. And while I can't say I actively tried to look on the bright side everyone spoke of, I did seek...