Skip to main content

Fact or Fiction?

Stereotypes. They are generalized assumptions about a group of people like "Asians are smart," or "Americans are fat and dumb"-- statements we all know too well. And the thing with stereotypes is that they hold true to a certain extent. That's why they can be so offensive! But have you ever wondered how or why these stereotypes came to be?

Jews, in particular, are often seen as frugal and even greedy, and in Maus, Spiegelman makes no attempt to hide that. Repeatedly, Spiegelman interrupts the chronology of Vladek's Holocaust account to allow Vladek to complain about his family's use of money. On page 116 of Maus I, Vladek picks up a telephone wire laying among some trash, and in response, Art becomes irritated and asks, "can't you just buy wire?" This kind of reaction is understandable, as Vladek seems to reinforce such a negative stereotype. 



What Art and most people don't realize, though, is that Vladek's experience has shaped him to act in such a manner. During the Holocaust, Vladek and his family soon realized that their wealth could not guarantee their safety and comfort. His attempt to pay his way out of Poland only led to his imprisonment, and his provision of food to the man outside the bunker led to his discovery. And later in the camps, money lost its value; having money did not necessarily allow for buying food or products. This sort of realization became reflected in Vladek's current lifestyle as he explained that "this wire they don't have it in any stores." 

By emphasizing Vladek's concern to hoard his money, Spiegelman conveys a point that the behaviors people display are wired and truly understandable as an effect of trauma and impactful experience. So although we, Americans, may be seen as gluttonous and ignorant, I guess you could say... look on the bright side?

Comments

  1. I really liked how you started your piece with examples of stereotypes that everyone can understand and relate to in some way. I also thought you did a very nice job describing how the events Vladek took place in shaped him to act the way he does and how that ties to people not being able to understand another's traits or actions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I liked how you centered you blog around stereotypes and how it effects Vladek and his actions. I also liked how you related everything back to Americans at the end of your blog. I also liked how you describe how Art acts in this event because it is critical to understanding the relationship between the two.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really liked how you started your post about stereotypes that are so prevalent today, and continued to relate everything back to it.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The beginning with a broad claim, which was then narrowed down to it's application in Maus, was great format, and I also liked the way you had American as an example in the beginning and then brought it up again in the end, kept the consistency.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Gray Area

As we discuss the roles of pictures and words in conveying a story, I become mildly conflicted in several aspects. First, and most obviously, which one does the better job? To me, both forms of storytelling allow for creativity and personal thought. But, while writing is both specific and yet very imagination-based, illustrations tend to be only the latter. A drawing calls for "broader topics" (McCloud 815) of assumptions. And while that may be seen as a good thing, I see it as a source of miscommunication. Because images are open to so many different interpretations, often, the author's intended meaning is not truly understood. Similarly, I regularly find myself wondering if, as readers, we also look too much into the text and find meaning when the author actually had none. What if the author didn't really have a specific theme in mind and just wanted to write an amusing story? Of course, I may just be too simple-minded and unqualified, but I find myself doubting t...

Never Let Anyone Dull your Sparkle! (unless you're the 1920s)

Knowing that the Great Gatsby is set in the 1920s, I had been looking forward to reading the book for so long. This decade has always fascinated me because of its creation of a new society, which--for the first time in history--is relatable to ours. In my perspective, before the 1920s, history was bleak, the human lifestyle seemed near archaic, and nothing was the slightest bit comparable to the twenty-first century. But at the turn of a new decade, Roaring Twenties brought along the "New Woman" and the birth of mass culture, including a surge of trends and technology. A curtain for my car window? Of course, I'll buy it! However, in the Great Gatsby , I seemed to have forgotten that the book I was reading was about my favorite decade! Where's the excitement and innovation? Why aren't advertisements for the Model-T being shoved in my face? Needless to say, I was underwhelmed! But I don't think I was alone in thinking this. In fact, Fitzgerald's mess...

New Rules...

Rules. They're a set of regulations that we abide by daily. They're meant to create organization, civil conduct, and improvement among society. And it's necessary to enforce these rules so that order and integrity are ensured. But somewhere along the way of enforcing and following these rules, the purpose behind making them has been forgotten. At school, tardies exist to ensure that students are present for the lesson. But when you step into the classroom 30 seconds late (because of the terrible traffic leading up to the school campus), a mere four days of the ten weeks of a quarter, you are expected to spend several hours sitting idly for detention. The advisors tell you, "this will teach you to be punctual." But does it really make sense to be punished for multiple hours for missing a grand total of two minutes of your first period where class hasn't even really begun? Or when your teacher plays a movie because the school year is practically over, and yo...