Skip to main content

Shedding Some New Light

Now, I'm not sure if this is significant or not, but after chapter 10 in Song of Solomon, this has been on my mind. When Milkman entered the cave, he was "blinded by the absence of light." This struck me because earlier in the same chapter there was mention of "the absence of light" as he entered the Butler place.

I found that this phrase references "a newborn traveling through a birth canal" from the article "Signifying Circe in Toni Morrison's 'Song of Solomon.'" If this is true, that means that Milkman is starting to become a new person as he enters these dark places. In fact, we saw this new character as he realized his selfishness over what he did or didn't "deserve" in chapter 11. After he left the cave, Milkman started encountering the most threatening situations of his life. First, the brawl at the store and then the attempted murder from his lovely best friend Guitar.

But going back to the first mention of an absence of light, I'm going to say that I'm extremely confused by Circe's presence. Was she a hallucination or was she really alive...? And I think that's the point of this passage: to make us confused, just like how Milkman was. This mystery matches the character of the Greek goddess Circe, who's an enchantress. That same article from before compares Macon II to Hades, from which Milkman escapes from to a new life. He has been in the "Underworld" his whole life, which could be connected to their last name: Dead. Mindblowing, right?! So as Milkman encounters magical Circe, he lives a new life, free from Guitar's judgement, Hagar's dangerous love, and, most of all, his family's emotional and financial dependence.

Comments

  1. Remember back when Milkman dreamed that Ruth was being overgrown by tulips (105), we were told to look out for when Morrison purposefully distorts reality? I think this must be it. There's no way Circe isn't at least a hundred and ten years old - and her having the voice of "a twenty-year-old girl" (240) just confirms that Morrison is indeed bending reality here. It's to get a point across - whether she's alive or dead, or a witch, or a ghost, it doesn't matter. Perhaps it's like how Jake's ghost appeared to Pilate and kept repeating "Sing" - maybe the most reasonable interpretation is that Circe is indeed dead but appears to Milkman to guide him on his journey. I also like how you research every time and tie in outside sources to uncover so many hidden meanings; in this book, it's not a question of whether something that seems significant is (because it surely is), it's a question of what we haven't found yet!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I never really thought that Toni Morrison wanted us to feel lost and confused as Milkman was when Circe was there. I really like your stance on it! I had to read some passages more than a couple times because I thought Circe was dead but she was there and had a voice of a twenty year old made me wonder if he was hallucinating.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I really like how you researched and used an article that we haven't read, it made it a lot more interesting to read. Also, the comparison the Greek gods was very interesting, I never thought of it like that but its pretty accurate! On a side note, I was very confused about Circe as well and I agree that Morrison might've wanted us to feel confused during that passage.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The part about being blinded by the abscense of light really struck me and I didn't really understand its significance. The part about Milkman finding himself in these dark places could also refer to him finding himself in the south without his wealth and power that he had in the north. In the north he is more influenced by white culture, but in the south where he is surrounded by his people (colored people), he starts to find himself. Even in chapter 12 he mentions how he is connected to this place and the people in it. I really enjoyed your analysis and I love the thought you put into it!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I liked your analysis on this on how Milkman grew as a person. I liked how you found something that we did not analyze in class and gave it a meaning for something that I did not catch. I also liked how you broke down the scene with Circe and that it is meant to be confusing to not know if she was alive or dead. I also thought that Morrison likes to bend the reality in places where she is trying to relay a message to the audience. The example of Circe was a great place for her to do that while not hindering the story in anyway and not taking the audience out of the magic of her book.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Such an interesting take on the novel! I love your connections throughout the story on light versus dark in Milkman's life. Circe also struck me as very odd. I was very unsure as to believe whether she was real or not as I was reading. The element of confusion, as you said, added another depth to the story. Nice blog!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Gray Area

As we discuss the roles of pictures and words in conveying a story, I become mildly conflicted in several aspects. First, and most obviously, which one does the better job? To me, both forms of storytelling allow for creativity and personal thought. But, while writing is both specific and yet very imagination-based, illustrations tend to be only the latter. A drawing calls for "broader topics" (McCloud 815) of assumptions. And while that may be seen as a good thing, I see it as a source of miscommunication. Because images are open to so many different interpretations, often, the author's intended meaning is not truly understood. Similarly, I regularly find myself wondering if, as readers, we also look too much into the text and find meaning when the author actually had none. What if the author didn't really have a specific theme in mind and just wanted to write an amusing story? Of course, I may just be too simple-minded and unqualified, but I find myself doubting t...

Never Let Anyone Dull your Sparkle! (unless you're the 1920s)

Knowing that the Great Gatsby is set in the 1920s, I had been looking forward to reading the book for so long. This decade has always fascinated me because of its creation of a new society, which--for the first time in history--is relatable to ours. In my perspective, before the 1920s, history was bleak, the human lifestyle seemed near archaic, and nothing was the slightest bit comparable to the twenty-first century. But at the turn of a new decade, Roaring Twenties brought along the "New Woman" and the birth of mass culture, including a surge of trends and technology. A curtain for my car window? Of course, I'll buy it! However, in the Great Gatsby , I seemed to have forgotten that the book I was reading was about my favorite decade! Where's the excitement and innovation? Why aren't advertisements for the Model-T being shoved in my face? Needless to say, I was underwhelmed! But I don't think I was alone in thinking this. In fact, Fitzgerald's mess...

New Rules...

Rules. They're a set of regulations that we abide by daily. They're meant to create organization, civil conduct, and improvement among society. And it's necessary to enforce these rules so that order and integrity are ensured. But somewhere along the way of enforcing and following these rules, the purpose behind making them has been forgotten. At school, tardies exist to ensure that students are present for the lesson. But when you step into the classroom 30 seconds late (because of the terrible traffic leading up to the school campus), a mere four days of the ten weeks of a quarter, you are expected to spend several hours sitting idly for detention. The advisors tell you, "this will teach you to be punctual." But does it really make sense to be punished for multiple hours for missing a grand total of two minutes of your first period where class hasn't even really begun? Or when your teacher plays a movie because the school year is practically over, and yo...