Skip to main content

And More

When it comes to the south and its history, you imagine either some sort of image resembling Little House on the Praire or slavery. Our thinking simply reflects the type of books we read. Historical southern fiction either portrays "refined, whitewashed folklore" (Sugar) or a slave's laborious and torturous living hell. We hardly see an in-between. So then what's the true story?

In 1811, on the German Coast in Louisana, the largest slave uprising in U.S. history occurred. In fact, "the execution tally was nearly twice as high as the number in Nat Turner's rebellion." Then why, you may ask, have we never heard of it? At the time, official reports of the incident described it as a band of "brigades," knowing that the reality of a well-organized slave revolt would be a threat to the institution ("How a Nearly Successful Slave Revolt Was Intentionally Lost to History"). And I have no doubts that cover-ups like this have occurred a numerous amount of times in history. But it's also wrong to say that all southern fiction or even non-fiction is deliberately romanticized and corrupted.

The picture-perfect white life we read about isn't a cover-up. Lots of people lived like that: with fancy houses, acres of land, and servants to cater to their every need. And often times, these residents didn't have to see the brutality that slaves lived in. So it's not wrong that books depict southern history in such a way, but it's necessary that as readers, we realize that glorified plantation life was not the common experience. There's always more to it.

Comments

  1. Ashley DavisOctober 19, 2019 at 12:16 PM

    I really liked the stance you took on your claim. Personally, I had never really stopped to think about how many whites actually lived as they are portrayed to in all the novels during that time period. I also think you did a very nice job using outside sources to help explain and support your position.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Allison WeiOctober 19, 2019 at 1:07 PM

    wow this was so interesting and well written. I'm so surprised that we never heard of that slave revolt - did Brinkley lie to us!? I love your sentence about how as readers we need to recognize that there's always more to it. Oftentimes, the books we read are simply reflections of an author's bias or life experiences, but in fiction especially, we can't recognize it because we assume that it's just a story.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Megan CaoOctober 20, 2019 at 9:39 AM

    Wow! this was amazing, i like how you touched upon perspective. School textbooks often cannot put in such graphic and violent images and words; they are only able to touch upon the horrors of what truly happened, but just because it is not explicitly written down does not mean that we should remain ignorant to all the suffering that people have experienced.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Julia StarrOctober 20, 2019 at 9:46 AM

    I liked how you said that the picture perfect white life is not a coverup. I guess I never really realized that the way whites lived was actually a pretty accurate portrayal during that time period in history.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Abby RizkOctober 20, 2019 at 12:24 PM

    First, wow. This was very well written. I love how you compared our individual thought processes to the books we read. I found it very interesting that we've never heard of that uprising that nearly succeeded. Your blogs are always a good read!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Gray Area

As we discuss the roles of pictures and words in conveying a story, I become mildly conflicted in several aspects. First, and most obviously, which one does the better job? To me, both forms of storytelling allow for creativity and personal thought. But, while writing is both specific and yet very imagination-based, illustrations tend to be only the latter. A drawing calls for "broader topics" (McCloud 815) of assumptions. And while that may be seen as a good thing, I see it as a source of miscommunication. Because images are open to so many different interpretations, often, the author's intended meaning is not truly understood. Similarly, I regularly find myself wondering if, as readers, we also look too much into the text and find meaning when the author actually had none. What if the author didn't really have a specific theme in mind and just wanted to write an amusing story? Of course, I may just be too simple-minded and unqualified, but I find myself doubting t...
7 comments
Read more

Never Let Anyone Dull your Sparkle! (unless you're the 1920s)

Knowing that the Great Gatsby is set in the 1920s, I had been looking forward to reading the book for so long. This decade has always fascinated me because of its creation of a new society, which--for the first time in history--is relatable to ours. In my perspective, before the 1920s, history was bleak, the human lifestyle seemed near archaic, and nothing was the slightest bit comparable to the twenty-first century. But at the turn of a new decade, Roaring Twenties brought along the "New Woman" and the birth of mass culture, including a surge of trends and technology. A curtain for my car window? Of course, I'll buy it! However, in the Great Gatsby , I seemed to have forgotten that the book I was reading was about my favorite decade! Where's the excitement and innovation? Why aren't advertisements for the Model-T being shoved in my face? Needless to say, I was underwhelmed! But I don't think I was alone in thinking this. In fact, Fitzgerald's mess...
7 comments
Read more

War and Peace

Violence. The Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it as the use of physical force so as to injure, abuse, damage, or destroy. In most ways violence can seem very obvious because of its portrayal in movies, video games, and crime; you picture blood, weapons, and fighting. But there seem to be sources of violence that tend to be less physical.  While looking at an image of a young boy in the arms of, presumably, his father whose head was covered by a bag, it seems that most of us agreed that it isn't  a violent image. In disbelief, Mrs. Valentino exclaimed that it is actually violent. However, in my head, it came across as almost peaceful. Now, I do acknowledge the sadness of this image, but what I really saw was a boy reuniting with his father among the vastness of a desert. There was a stillness that was reflected by the picture instead of the usual chaos that physical violence entails. So what really is violence? We can almost all agree that there should be a line dra...
7 comments
Read more