Skip to main content

And More

When it comes to the south and its history, you imagine either some sort of image resembling Little House on the Praire or slavery. Our thinking simply reflects the type of books we read. Historical southern fiction either portrays "refined, whitewashed folklore" (Sugar) or a slave's laborious and torturous living hell. We hardly see an in-between. So then what's the true story?

In 1811, on the German Coast in Louisana, the largest slave uprising in U.S. history occurred. In fact, "the execution tally was nearly twice as high as the number in Nat Turner's rebellion." Then why, you may ask, have we never heard of it? At the time, official reports of the incident described it as a band of "brigades," knowing that the reality of a well-organized slave revolt would be a threat to the institution ("How a Nearly Successful Slave Revolt Was Intentionally Lost to History"). And I have no doubts that cover-ups like this have occurred a numerous amount of times in history. But it's also wrong to say that all southern fiction or even non-fiction is deliberately romanticized and corrupted.

The picture-perfect white life we read about isn't a cover-up. Lots of people lived like that: with fancy houses, acres of land, and servants to cater to their every need. And often times, these residents didn't have to see the brutality that slaves lived in. So it's not wrong that books depict southern history in such a way, but it's necessary that as readers, we realize that glorified plantation life was not the common experience. There's always more to it.

Comments

  1. Ashley DavisOctober 19, 2019 at 12:16 PM

    I really liked the stance you took on your claim. Personally, I had never really stopped to think about how many whites actually lived as they are portrayed to in all the novels during that time period. I also think you did a very nice job using outside sources to help explain and support your position.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Allison WeiOctober 19, 2019 at 1:07 PM

    wow this was so interesting and well written. I'm so surprised that we never heard of that slave revolt - did Brinkley lie to us!? I love your sentence about how as readers we need to recognize that there's always more to it. Oftentimes, the books we read are simply reflections of an author's bias or life experiences, but in fiction especially, we can't recognize it because we assume that it's just a story.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Megan CaoOctober 20, 2019 at 9:39 AM

    Wow! this was amazing, i like how you touched upon perspective. School textbooks often cannot put in such graphic and violent images and words; they are only able to touch upon the horrors of what truly happened, but just because it is not explicitly written down does not mean that we should remain ignorant to all the suffering that people have experienced.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Julia StarrOctober 20, 2019 at 9:46 AM

    I liked how you said that the picture perfect white life is not a coverup. I guess I never really realized that the way whites lived was actually a pretty accurate portrayal during that time period in history.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Abby RizkOctober 20, 2019 at 12:24 PM

    First, wow. This was very well written. I love how you compared our individual thought processes to the books we read. I found it very interesting that we've never heard of that uprising that nearly succeeded. Your blogs are always a good read!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Pick Your Poison

 Would you rather find out that your significant other is cheating on you or never find out? Though very far away and presumably irrelevant to your and my current circumstances, this question raises an issue that's not so far from what we know: Is ignorance really bliss? Sure, I typically respond to the opening question by selecting the latter choice of oblivion as I imagine the pain and hassle it entails, but after I contemplate and fight my instinct, I choose the wiser option. The more daunting one. I choose to pop the bubble of ignorance and learn the truth. Let's break it down. Your significant other is cheating on you. This action may be a result of a few reasons, the major being dissatisfaction in the relationship and/or sole disloyalty and a lack of integrity. A cheater is prone to cheating more than once, and if one continues it may just be a sign of bad character. Do you really want to be with someone who isn't committed to you? Someone who doesn't find satisfa...
Post a Comment
Read more

Welcome Back

Every meeting, email, or letter begins with a greeting. "Good morning," "hello," or "dear *recipient.*" Only once an opening has been made can the intent of communication be addressed. However, though unnecessary in content, such polite phrases serve to transition and maintain friendly relations beyond just solemn work. In Korean, the staple greeting comparable to "hi" or "hello," literally means, how are you? However, no one interprets it that way or responds to the question. Despite not staying true to its meaning, it is a necessary means of easing into the meat of a conversation. Very isolated from the other employees, I often found myself asking for favors or questions at work without saying "hi" or "how are you" first. I noticed I was disrupting their work and disregarding their existence as a person and instead only seeing them as a source of inquiry. By bypassing any greeting, any conversation becomes too a...
5 comments
Read more

The Fiction of Eye Contact

This picture makes me so  uncomfortable.  While it's eye-opening to find reason behind the normalities of point of view in film, the eye-level shot appears far from normal in my eyes. Is it the purple suit? The hands crossed? Or the specific positioning of the viewer on a table that makes me so uneasy? It's probably a combination of my suspicions, but I've decided that to its core, it's the eye contact that creates my discomfort. Most of these types of shots never reach the extent of eye contact. Instead, the similarity in levels creates a feeling of similarity shared by the character and viewer. There is no power disparity, no difference in viewpoint. Look at Forrest Gump and this eye-level shot (note that he's not looking at you). But once eye contact comes into play, the connection is too strong. Of course, any good producer will aim to form a connection for an audience to a film. However, there's comfort in a screen lying between a film and its viewer. It...
Post a Comment
Read more